Queen
Anne's Revenge
Laboratory Excavation Report
UAB Preservation Laboratory, Fort Fisher
Nathan Henry, UAB Conservator
Wendy Welsh, QAR Conservator Technician
August 2002
Eighty objects were processed during the month of August representing
45 concretions (QAR field numbers).
Artifact
molds within concretion made up 60% of the material processed and will
need to be cast with epoxy or polysulfide resin, and concretion material
cleaned from the resulting artifact cast. Some of these concretions
contain as many as six artifact molds. Iron objects made up 7.5% of
the processed material. These objects will need to undergo electrolysis
treatment to remove chlorides from the metal. Two cannon shot and one
wrought-iron bar shot were the most significant of the iron artifacts.
Two ceramic sherds were recovered: one red earthenware sherd and one
salt-glaze stoneware sherd. These items have been cleaned and dehydrated.
One glass fragment was recovered, appearing to be a fragment of a case
bottle. Organic material made up 12.5% of the material processed. Bone
fragments and wood made up these objects. The bone has been dehydrated
and awaits faunal analysis. The wood objects were generally insignificant
although two have been identified as possible hull structure fragments.
Ballast stones made up 12.5% of the material processed. These have received
no treatment and await geological analysis. One lead sheet was recovered.
This has been dehydrated and coated with microcrystaline wax.
A number of lead shot/glass/iron nail concretions have undergone preliminary
analysis. These concretions are considered significant because the existence
of glass fragments and nails within the same context as lead shot suggests
their secondary use as anti-personnel ammunition. These concretions
should be carefully documented prior to disassembly. Due to the variety
of material these concretions contain, their processing will pose a
considerable challenge.
..Back
to Conservation On
to September 2002...
|