
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning May 2nd and continuing for three weeks, archaeologists will continue the work they began with the May 2005 Expedition. The goal is to complete the excavation of a stratified representation of the shipwreck site by recovering approximately 10% of what is thought to survive on the seabed. In the end, recovery will involve the excavation of up to 20 excavation units - three within each of the five interior zones with additional units placed at the longitudinal extremities. These zones represent sections of the ship from stern to bow based on our current understanding of the site through archaeology. Managerial objectives will be met through the retrieval of a representative sample from across the shipwreck as a control collection prior to any further degradation of the site from storm scour and exposure. By examining and recovering remains from all parts of the archaeological site, managers will refine their understanding of the extent, nature, and magnitude of shipwreck remains in preparation for planning full-scale recovery. Directed sampling and analysis will also address general research questions regarding site layout, identify shipboard activity areas, continue refining the nature, origin and identity of the lost ship, and gather data regarding natural and cultural factors that have influenced the formation of the archaeological record. The collection of representative sample remains from this shipwreck and the arrangement of artifacts within basic functional groups will provide a body of evidence for comparison with archaeological assemblages recovered from contemporary shipwrecks along the Atlantic seaboard, the Caribbean and Europe and terrestrial sites within the Carolina's and Virginia. Funding is being provided in part by a grant from the Golden LEAF Foundation, state appropriations to the NC Department of Cultural Resources and a National Geographic Expeditions Council grant. In-kind support comes from NC Marine Fisheries, Cape Fear Community College, NC Maritime Museum, Comfort Inn of Morehead City, Parker Marine Inc. and a host of individual participants. We will be providing periodic field updates welcome aboard!! Entry - 02 May 2006 Expedition Log The expedition began Tuesday with the arrival of the setup team
from the Underwater Archaeology Branch, Fort Fisher aboard R/V Snap
Dragon (Captain Gillman-Bryan). It was just in time to pay tribute
to the first group of recreational diver, who were visiting the
shipwreck site as part of QAR Dive Down. As evidenced from a multi-beam survey conducted by Geodynamics, Inc. in February, the immediate shipwreck site shows scouring behind the exposed mound and toward shore. This occurred because of strong winds during hurricane Ophelia last fall. While the storm currents removed sediment from the northern portion of the site it pushed up sand on the margins and thus the moorings, which are approximately 150 feet from the exposed mound, were mostly buried and needed to be dug out, especially on the east side. The vertical accuracy of the multi-beam survey is 2 cm and thus gives scientists a very clear understanding of sand movement at the site. Needless to say the scouring that takes place during hurricanes is a major concern when considering the overall affect on the site's archaeological integrity and the preservation of fragile artifacts. Entry - 08 May 2006 Expedition Log
After the 5'x 5' mapping frame was placed over Units 10 and 11 excavation began on Unit 10 using the 6" water induction dredge and within a few minutes a large set of concreted cask hoops were uncovered. As digging continued it became apparent that Unit 10 was one big mass of iron concretion with a few loose ballast stones. In the eastern portion was the large wooden sternpost discovered last spring in the adjacent Unit 9. Archaeologists decided to re-open Unit 9 to allow more complete documentation of this important structural element and to facilitate the collection of small artifacts, including a bar shot and two long bolts, and sediment for comparison with other areas of the site. Excavations continued through the afternoon in Units 9 and 10 while another crew positioned and put corner posts in units scheduled for excavation during this expedition. Entry - 09 May 2006 Expedition Log
On this day the visibility was considerably better, at times exceeding 10 feet and allowing for quicker work and better documentation. The 6" dredge was moved to Unit 11 while the smaller 3" dredge continued on Unit 9 until all artifacts were mapped, tagged and removed and a "scoop" sample of sediment was collected. In Unit 11 archaeologists found no artifacts indicating this area was just outside the artifact scatter and therefore, Unit 12 the grid square was pivoted on the southwest corner stake 180 degrees toward the main ballast area. In Unit 12 artifacts were present and numerous consisting of ballast and various metal concretions, mostly cask hoop fragments. In the same manner as Unit 11, Unit 13 was excavated until it was apparent that no artifacts were present. Entry - 11 May 2006 Expedition Log The wind shift to the south and offshore did not happen as quickly as forecast and researchers were able to work most of the day until finally the affects were felt from ocean swells, which stirred up visibility and made archaeological excavation and mapping difficult. Prior to this considerable progress was made. Unit 15, at the very southern extreme of the site, contained only two linear metal concretions. This was not the case for Unit 16, which was placed on the southeastern margin of the main ballast pile next to Cannon C5. Archaeologists spent most of the day mapping and recovery artifacts - ballast alone number in the hundreds - and there were a variety of pieces ceramics, glass and unidentifiable concretions. Concurrently, excavations took place at Unit 17, which was placed over an area previously explored in 1998 and revealed a large lead strip used for patching a leak in the vessel and a variety of other concretions. As with several others, this unit was also on the margin of the site and helped delineate the extent of artifacts. It also helped substantiate our previous site map and examined changes over the past 8 years. Very little change was noted.
Entry - 12 May 2006 Expedition Log A small crew found working conditions marginal at best. They installed four corner stakes in preparation for unit excavations next week and returned to dock around noon. Meanwhile, the conservators stayed ashore carefully pack a week's worth of artifact recovery for the trip to Greenville and safe storage at the QAR conservation laboratory.
Entry - 15 May 2006 Expedition Log
Blown out by storm winds today. R/V Shell Point transfers equipment shore at its Ft. Macon berthing and later in the day R/V Martech from Cape Fear Community College's Marine Tech Program arrives to take over duties as primary research vessel. Many thanks to Shell Point's Captain Tom Piner, Mate Jason Hill and the NC Marine Fisheries Habitat Enhancement Section, Craig Hardy Chief.
Entry - 16 May 2006 Expedition Log
Entry - 17 May 2006 Expedition Log
Entry - 18 May 2006 Expedition Log All hands stand down and relax was the decision after R/V Martech's captain in consultation with archaeological supervisors determined that the sea state was marginal when observed at 8:00 am and reports were calling for worsening conditions throughout the day. While everyone is eager to continue excavation, a day off is never a bad thing because it allows for catching up on paperwork and miscellaneous odd jobs, as well as a time to rest and recharge after a hectic yesterday.
One or two days of foul weather may be a relief to a hard working crew but more than that made it impossible to complete expedition objectives in the time allowed. Southwest winds continued to make conditions unworkable and so on Saturday morning a disappointed crew packed up and wished R/V Martech well as she headed back down the waterway to Wilmington. While we weren't able to complete research objectives, our efforts to engage the public far surpassed expectations. Over the last four days an estimated 1,500 people viewed the "fresh catch", cannon C5, either at Fort Macon State Park or at the grand opening of the Pine Knoll Shores NC Aquarium. Furthermore, media coverage was extensive and included four regional television stations, Freedom News Service (Jacksonville Daily News), Carteret News-Times, Canadian Broadcast Corporation Radio, WHQR Public Radio, and BBC News International. Interest continues to remain high and provides project members an opportunity to explain the many facets of research surrounding this fascinating shipwreck. Many, many thanks to all involved in this year's expedition.
Expedition Log - Final Days Sometimes
it requires a sneak attack to get the task completed. After
a frustrating week of poor weather during the formal expedition
period, project staff decided to give it one more try May
30th, 31st, and June 1st. Our goal of completing at least
three excavation units within each zone and several at either
end of the site had fallen short by four units. As luck
would have it or perhaps due to our stealth in planning
(very few folks knew about our return to the site including
the weather gods), rare easterly winds provided a wonderful
backdrop to get the job done.The day after Memorial Day, state archaeologists began work aboard R/V Snap Dragon (Captain Julep Gillman-Bryan) by assessing and repairing damage to the site's reference line system and re-establishing the grid position over Unit 19, which had been set up but left untouched. The
visibility was excellent, allowing them to move quickly
and soon they were removing the sand overburden with the
3' dredge system. While progress goes much slower than the
bigger 6" system, it is more pleasant and in the case
of Unit 20 where little sand covered the artifacts it was
enough. By the end of the day they had mapped and recovered
a handful of artifacts - a few ballast, spike-like concretions,
a couple pieces of glass and pottery, and collected the
sand sample. When they returned to dock, the shore crew
was in the process of loading the UNC - Chapel Hill/Institute
of Marine Sciences R/V Capricorn (Captain Joe Purifoy)
with the big excavation gear and conservation tanks.
Beginning the next morning at 7:30 am and continuing to
6 pm on June 1st, archaeologists worked hard and steady. They first
took on Unit 20, which was at the near shore end of the site where
artifacts were thinning out. Artifacts included a couple of small
ballast and a few concretions, one which had a piece green bottle
glass protruding from it. Meanwhile the smaller dredge went to Unit
21, which contained several hundred ballast ranging in size from
that of a volleyball to a golf ball. With these units virtually completed by the end of the first day, it looked like we would finish up the final unit by mid-day and get everybody including artifacts on the road and home at a decent hour. But that's what we get for thinking. Unit 23 was placed out to the west at the outer limits of the projected artifact dispersion. Here overburden is at least several feet thick and after some time, excavators reported that there were no artifacts here. In an effort to define the limits of the site as has been done along other margins of the site, a small trench was excavated easterly toward the mound until eventually artifacts were discovered. At this point Unit 23 was established and excavated. Artifacts recovered were a number of cannon ball and lead shot concretions. As it usually works, as the unit was being cleaned and sediment samples take an object appeared on the edge of an adjacent unit. It was an intact grindstone for sharpening bladed instruments. To the delight of everyone this interesting object was brought to the surface and brought to an end the stratified sampling project. We now have fully excavated approximately 7% of the shipwreck from all areas of the site. This will be important in planning our next step. Field
Operations          
Conservation Operations
|
Home | Archaeology | Artifacts | Conservation | Contact Us | Education | Environment | History | QAR Project