Expedition Reports
Entry - 04 May 2005 Director's
Log
Mark Wilde-Ramsing
With great anticipation researchers and technicians working
under the
auspices of the Queen Anne's Revenge Shipwreck Project, North Carolina
Underwater Archaeology Branch, rendezvoused Monday May 2nd. This begins
recovery operations for the first time since the fall of 2000 when archaeologists
completed the emergency recovery of a section of hull timbers and associated
artifacts. The expedition is possible due to the development of a professionally
staffed conservation laboratory in partnership with East Carolina University.
As importantly, an electronic artifact tracking and analytical system
for the large volume of artifacts that result from recovery operations
is up and running. Finally, over 15,000 artifacts, recovered during
assessment and emergency recovery activities at the QAR site, have been
processed, stabilized, and transferred for display and long-term storage
at the North Carolina Maritime Museum.

This year's expedition, however, would not have happened without a
major grant from the Golden
LEAF Foundation, which provided the funding to help reinvigorate
the Queen Anne's Revenge Shipwreck Project through field research
and artifact recovery. In turn, the public attention will heighten
travel and tourism for those seeking to learn more about the classic
shipwreck suspected to be Blackbeard's lost flagship and in turn,
provide an economic boost for North Carolina and the coast. A second
condition of the grant is job training in high-skill fields that include
artifact conservation, marine studies, and computer technology, provided
through East Carolina University, Cape Fear Community College, University
of North Carolina at Wilmington and Carteret Community College, respectively.
The opportunity to continue recovery at the shipwreck affords archaeologists
a valuable opportunity to test currentunderstanding of site layout,
and past conditions and processes that have turned a large, heavily
armed 18th century wooden ship into a scatter of artifacts lying on
the seabed. The detective work continues to untangle the mystery of
the infamous pirate ship. Why and how did it wreck on the outer shoals
of a seldom-used inlet?
Why were many useful items, such as anchors, cannons and pewter plates,
left aboard to be swallowed by the sea, while many other items are
absent, most notably personal affects like buttons, buckles, coins,
and firearms? To get at these and many other questions, archaeologists
have developed a rigorous plan to sample areas throughout the site
using 5 foot by 5-foot excavation units. They expect to find evidence
of the galley stove, explore the officers' quarters in the stern,
search for more cannons, and nearly quadruple the number of artifacts
recovered over the past eight years. Beyond research, recovering a
stratified sample from across the shipwreck will insure that an important
collection has been removed from harm's way in the unfortunate event
of a hurricane hitting the North Carolina coast in the near future.

Success of this expedition is dependent on many. At the top of the
list is the Marine Technology Program at Cape Fear Community College,
which is furnishing their research vessel R/V Martech, captain and
mate in return for training opportunities for their students. The
US Coast Guard Fort Macon Station, a situation that logistically couldn't
be better, is providing docking and staging facilities. As in the
past, the North Carolina Maritime Museum, the Institute of Marine
Science, UNC-CH, and Intersal, Inc. who first found the shipwreck
site in 1996, continue to make important contributions. Many people,
especially our many friends in Carteret County, have quietly and steadily
provided their support for the project and without it, the quality
of research and efforts to heighten public awareness of this important
discovery would not have been possible. Thanks to all for your support.
We are happy you can join us as we explore one of the most exciting,
internationally recognized shipwrecks discovered to date, which lies
in North Carolina waters a short distance off the coast. Watch for
expedition updates on the QAR website at www.qaronline.org to follow
our progress during the month of May. And if you want to see things
first hand, plan a visit to Ft. Macon State Park, because looking
out from the ramparts of the fort you can easily see the recovery
vessels anchored on the site. From that viewpoint you can let your
mind wonder for it is not hard to imagine a large wooden, three-mast,
square-rigged ship flying the black flag sailing directly for you
as it attempts to make its way past the treacherous inlet shoals into
the protected harbor of Beaufort.
Entry - 06 May 2005 Director's Log
Mark Wilde-Ramsing
The crew had a good day Wednesday during which equipment details were
worked out both topside with the pump and sluice arrangements and underwater
where the first excavation unit E90N130 was laid out (see excavation site
plan). All units are designated by their SW corner and have been chosen
to adequately sample the shipwreck site and also address specific research
questions. For instance the first unit was placed to explore the nature
and extent of materials at the north end where a high degree of artifact
dispersal from scouring was expected. This is also projected to be the
bow area and therefore, the types of artifacts, such as items from the
bosun's locker and crew's quarters, should be present. Researchers will
also use this unit as one of four placed on the margins of the site to
examine the scour-resistant layer that underlies cultural remains. Wednesday
evening Robbie and Debbie Girard hosted the crew for a kickoff dinner.
On
Thursday an attempt was made to work, however strong northeast winds
soon became too intense and diving operations were called after dredging
equipment lying on the bottom was secured. Everyone went home due to
forecasts of extreme weather over the next few days. Operations will
resume on Sunday with a partial crew and are expected to be in full
swing by Monday.

Entry - 11 May 2005 Director's
Log
Mark Wilde-Ramsing
Bull's eye! Researchers used the results of the 1999 gradiometer
survey to place their second excavation unit at E75/N110 (see excavation
plan) to explore an area suspected of being an unrecorded cannon (C24).
Wednesday morning after excavators had removed several feet of overburden,
the call came up that top of a thick, 8 1/2-foot long 6-pounder cannon
had been located lying across the middle of the unit. As mapping began
and excavations progressed down to the lower layers where many additional
artifacts are expected, the buzz on the deck of R/V Martech was how
C24 will be lifted and taken ashore.

But, alas, we have gotten ahead of ourselves. At the beginning
of the week it was slow going. While the foul weather of last first
week was gone, the effects were very apparent on Monday and Tuesday.
First off the first excavation unit (E90/N130) that was partially
excavated was completely filled and required starting over to the
mobile sand overburden. The worst problem from the storm, however,
was the extreme low visibility caused by all the rain, which flushed
a lot of fine sediment out the inlet. At the same time waves and
currents stirred the water up like a washing machine. Researchers
complained that often they could not see objects 2 inches in front
of their masks. Dave Moore joked on Monday that he moved one step
above brail archaeology to psychic archaeology! In those conditions
little can be done and whatever the basic tasks are they take much
longer to perform. It wasn't until Wednesday that water conditions
settled down and by the afternoon divers were happily reporting
visibility of 10 feet.

Beginning Tuesday afternoon artifacts began coming up from E90/N130
and they consisted of a few sections of barrel hoops, a couple of
ballast stone and several concretions that appeared to contain nails
and other undetermined objects. Based on their weight concretions
from this unit are not likely to contain much, if any, lead shot.
One concretion consisted of the remains of several thick wooden
timbers with a large bolt running through it. This would likely
was part of the vessel's lower hull or bow, where construction was
more substantial. A sediment sample of the very bottom of the artifact
layer, examined by Dr. James Craig, was found to be devoid of lead
shot, gold dust, or other small artifacts. With all artifacts removed
from the first unit excavation moved on to the second unit on Wednesday.
Entry - 13 May 2005 Project Archaeologist/Divemaster
Chris Southerly
The weather this week continues to be good and work on the site
is progressing well. Thursday's work focused on the excavation
of Unit 2 (E75/N110). After careful mapping of exposed artifacts
to record their precise locations, the various encrusted objects
were tagged and recovered. Topside conservators did initial documentation
taking measurements and photographs before padding the objects
for temporary storage until transport to the conservation lab
in Greenville at the end of the week.
One large concretion in Unit 2, too large for a diver to handle,
was rigged with a small lift bag, moved under R/V Martech, and recovered
with the "A" frame and cable winch. The recovery went smoothly and
served as an excellent test for the cannon recovery planned for the
final week of the project.
As the cleanup of Unit 2 continued with the 3" excavation
intake, divers moved the large 6" excavation intake to Unit
3 (E110/N95). In short order, the find of the day showed up just
below the sand level in Unit 3. An intact
onion bottle, sitting upright between several ballast stones,
was exposed. After mapping its location and elevation, and taking
digital video of the bottle in situ, it was carefully recovered.
The bottle's shape places it in the early 18th century and it
makes a total of 3 intact bottles recovered from the site.
Work continued Friday excavating, mapping, tagging and recovering
encrusted objects from Unit 3. The final task of the week was
the rigging and lifting of cannon C24 from within Unit 2. Weighing
in at over 2000 pounds with the concretion and attached encrusted
objects, it is a large 6-pounder. Divers placed the cannon in
a staging area for the planned recovery in week four.
Monday will begin excavation of Unit 4 and the final
cleanup of any artifacts from Unit 2 that were beneath cannon
C24. Hopefully the weather will cooperate to give us another good
week of operations.
Entry - 20 May 2005 Project
Archaeologist/Divemaster
Chris Southerly
Week 3 began cloudy, with strong swells, and scattered
light showers. Conditions improved throughout the day
and the week was very productive until the weather changed again
and prevented the crew from working on Friday.
Archaeologists completed cleanup and recovery of
Unit 3 early Monday, collecting ballast stones and concretions.
Excavation on Unit 4 began in the afternoon and in short order
exposed part of a previously identified cannon , C15. A 4-pounder,
weighing around 800 pounds this cannon is similar in size to the
previously recovered C4. The concern was that C15 might be attached
to a large buried concretion making it difficult to move. Further
excavation in Unit 4 determined that C15 was not concreted to
a larger mass and by the end of Tuesday, it was rigged and lifted
from the excavation unit in preparation for recovery during the
final week of the project.
Wednesday before leaving the dock, the
A-frame and winch on R/V Martech was load tested to 2500 pounds
in anticipation of recovery of cannons C15 and C24 during the final
week. On site the final cleanup, elevations, sediment sample, and
removal of concretions from Unit 4 was completed while excavation
begins on Unit 5.
Thursday a media crew from ABC News joined the expedition to shoot
and prepare a story for ABC World News Tonight. Cleanup of Unit 5 was
completed and Unit 6 and 7 were excavated and documented. No artifacts
or concretions were found in Unit 6 but the highlight of the day is
a large lead object recovered from Unit 7. It
could be a lead scupper used to channel water from the deck, but because
of its size and shape, archaeologists believe it may be an 18th century
urinal referred to as a pissdale that was located in the stern for use
by the ship's officers. The joke quickly circulated around the boat
that Blackbeard's head had been found here in Beaufort Inlet, that Lt.
Maynard didn't take it with him back to Norfolk. Look for the story
and video Friday May, 27 2005 on ABC World News Tonight.
Entry - 24 May 2005 Director's
Log
Mark Wilde-Ramsing
By Tuesday morning the southwest winds that had prevented work
at the site shifted around to the north and the waters were calm
but rolling. R/V Martech with an anxious crew got underway early
as members of the media began to arrive. When the press boats
left the dock at 9 AM they carried 17 members of the press representing
AP radio, most of the TV outlets in eastern North Carolina, Carteret
News Times, Freedom News Service, and East Magazine. The boats
were provided by Coast Guard Fort Macon, Chief Hall captain, and
Comfort Inn Morehead City, Tom Bennet captain, who both did an
excellent job providing great camera shots of activities occurring
off the stern of Martech.
Raising Cannon C15, a 4-pounder weighing approximately 1000 pounds,
was the target of the morning and divers worked swiftly to attach
a large air bag to the lifting harness to the cannon as it rested
23 feet below the ocean surface. Divers slowly filled the bag
and within minutes it popped to the surface where divers attached
it to a lifting system and it was gently pulled up to the deck.
As it broke the surface into the light of day for the first time
in nearly 300 years a hearty round of applause greeted the encrusted
weapon. Attached to it were pieces of its gun carriage, shards
of glass, and hundreds of small lead shot.
Cannon C15 was taken back to the Coast Guard station where it
was off-loaded to a trailer and carried to the parking lot at
Fort Macon State Park and put on public exhibit for an hour. This
rare glimpse of a "fresh catch" from the seabed was
a big hit for 85 visitors. One fellow had left Maryland at 4 in
the morning and drove down to see the remarkable artifact. Lots
of questions were asked and photographs taken as archaeologists
continued to pour water over the cannon with the same care that
marine biologists give to a stranded dolphin. At the end of the
session, Cannon C15 was placed back in water to await its transport
to the state conservation laboratory in Greenville and begin a
3-year cleaning and stabilization process. Eventually it will
return to the coast for display at the North Carolina Maritime
Museum.
Such a day!
Click
here to see the Photos of the day.
Entry -Final May 2005 Director's
Log
Mark Wilde-Ramsing
Yes, perhaps Blackbeard still had his thumb on big ole' C24,
a cannon which weighs at least 2,500 pounds with all its crusty
adornments attached including a lead sounding weight. On Tuesday
it didn't want to come aboard R/V MarTech and stalled the lifting
winch just before it made deck. Researchers put her back on the
seabed and called out for help from R/V West Bay (Captain Caroon),
NC Marine Fisheries, a 153' landing craft with mobile crane. At
11 AM on Thursday, after a long period getting C24 off the bottom
with lift bags and a longer period to get the recovery vessel
and cannon linked, the encrusted cannon finally hit the surface
with little fanfare but a large sense of relief. Unlike the public
recovery of C15, researchers quickly brought the artifact into
port at the Fort Macon Coast Guard facility, loaded it on a trailer,
and whisked to off to the state conservation laboratory and into
a large vat of fresh water.
Click here to
see the Photos of the day.
The cannon recovery was by no means all that was taking
place over the last few days of the expedition. On Wednesday, archaeologists
opened up Unit 8 (E85/N25) and almost immediately began finding
identifiable artifacts including two
pewter plates and half
of a pewter charger, the bottom of a large French square case
bottle, a large amount of curious brass wire, a piece of red
earthenware storage jar, and the delicate
stem of a wine glass complete with molded diamonds and crowns.
In the evening researchers eagerly poured over their artifact analysis
references and tentatively identified the glass piece as a "Silesian"
stem, which was English in origin, replicated German wares beginning
in 1714 when George I took the crown. Being four-sided rather than
six or eight makes it an early style and places it contemporaneous
with the sinking of Queen Anne's Revenge.
One never knows what Mother Nature will deliver and
on Thursday with winds shifting to the west and the surface conditions
marginal for working, the underwater visibility was in access of
forty feet! Anyone with mask and snorkel could put their face in
the water
and see the entire site and all the activity 23 feet below. With
conditions like this, of course, there was a frenzy of activity
with photographers shooting tape after tape, roll after roll, while
archaeologists examined in detail every nook and cranny of the site.
The clear water greatly aided mapping and recovery in Unit 8 which
was producing a wealth of artifacts as excavation continued.
In the final excavation Unit 9 (E110/N50), explorers
found perhaps their biggest surprise. The unit lies on the southeastern
margin of the site where all that was expected was a scattering
of ballast stone, if any artifacts at all. Here researchers found
buried deeply in the sediments what appears to be a portion of the
sternpost of the ship. The heavy timber exhibits a grooved edge
(rabbet) where the planking ends would have fit and has at least
one iron gudgeon strap, one of several that would have held the
rudder in place. This large wooden piece, which was in an excellent
state of preservation, suggests that the stern must have twisted
and fallen out to the vessel's starboard side after the majority
of the ship's deck equipment (ie. cannon) spilled to the port. The
find provides exciting new information to help reconstruct the wrecking
event, as well as, the ship itself and one that will bring eager
researchers back in the future.

|